3R principle as minimum ethics in animal experimentation

Authors

Abstract

Non-human animals are routinely used in research, although studies refute the premise that results
generated in this way benefit society. Law 11,794/2008 established ethics committees on the use
of animals, with the authority to normatively and ethically evaluate teaching and research protocols.
However, gaps in the bioethics training of committee representatives and a lack of incentive to implement
substitute techniques, in addition to the more significant concern with compliance with the standard than
with animal ethics, end up disregarding non-human animals morally. Despite the advancement of animal
welfare practices, the commitment of institutions to support the work of ethics committees on the use of
animals is low, as is the commitment of the National Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation
in the formation and guidance of these committees so that they can exercise their powers and raise
awareness among researchers regarding the ethical principles of animal experimentation.

Keywords:

Ética. Bioética. Experimentação animal. Animais de laboratório. Alternativas ao uso de animais. Comitês de cuidado animal.

Author Biography

Tatiana Tavares da Silva, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brasil.

PhD in Bioethics, Applied Ethics and Public Health -PPGBIOS- Program in association UFRJ/FIOCRUZ/UERJ/UFF. Associate Professor at Information Technology and Health Education Department - Medical Sciences College - UERJ. Permanent Professor in Postgraduate Program in Bioethics, Applied Ethics and Collective Health - PPGBIOS - UERJ

How to Cite

1.
Batista da Silva R, Tavares da Silva T. 3R principle as minimum ethics in animal experimentation. Rev. bioét.(Impr.). [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 4 [cited 2025 Feb. 3];32. Available from: https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/3782