Editorial: Predatory journals and editorial fraud: protecting trust in scientific communication

Authors

Abstract

Scientific communication is based on trust. Authors expect their manuscripts to be evaluated according to recognized editorial and scientific criteria; readers assume that published knowledge is reliable; reviewers devote their time and expertise
to the critical evaluation of manuscripts; and institutions, indexing services, and funding agencies depend on the integrity of journals to disseminate and preserve scientific output.

Keywords:

Bioética. Revistas predatórias como assunto. Comunicação e divulgação científica.

Author Biography

Dilza Teresinha Ambrós Ribeiro, Conselho Regional de Medicina do Acre, Rio Branco/AC, Brasil.

Dilza Teresinha Ambrós Ribeiro – Doctora – dilza.ribeiro@portalmedico.org.br
0000-0001-8180-4008

Vol. 34 (2026): Continuous publication

Published:

2026-11-09

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-804220260003PT

Downloads

How to Cite

1.
Teresinha Ambrós Ribeiro D. Editorial: Predatory journals and editorial fraud: protecting trust in scientific communication. Rev. Bioét. [Internet]. 2026 Nov. 9 [cited 2026 Nov. 9];34. Available from: https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/4676

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.