Diagnosis and dilemas: the intersection between brain death and bioethics

Authors

Abstract

Brain death is a complex medical and bioethical concept that requires rigorous diagnostic criteria to ensure
accuracy and safety. In Brazil, Federal Medical Council Resolution 2,173/2017 establishes a protocol that
combines a detailed neurological clinical examination—absence of responsiveness, brainstem reflexes,
and apnea—with complementary tests, such as transcranial doppler, angiotomography, and perfusion
studies, especially in inconclusive cases. This literature review compares national and international
guidelines and discusses the application of Beauchamp and Childress’ bioethical principles – autonomy,
beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice – in the doctor-patient relationship to respect dignity, values,
and cultural context. The integration of medical science, diagnostic technology, and ethical principles
favors safer, more humane, and legally supported decisions. Despite the limitations inherent in narrative
reviews, the research reinforces the need for standardized protocols and suggests future investigations
into diagnostic accuracy and the practical application of bioethical principles in determining brain death.

Keywords:

Brain death, Death, Bioethics, Neurologic examination, Critical care, Philosophy, Brain death. Death. Bioethics. Neurologic examination. Critical care. Philosophy.

Author Biographies

Leandro Baptistella Casagrande, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul/RS, Brasil.

Leandro Baptistella Casagrande – Mestrando – leandrocasagrande98@gmail.com
0000-0002-4014-2666

Victorio Souza Boff, Universidade de Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul/RS, Brasil.

Victorio Souza Boff – Graduando – victoriosoboff@gmail.com
0009-0001-6032-3325

How to Cite

1.
Casagrande LB, Boff VS. Diagnosis and dilemas: the intersection between brain death and bioethics. Rev. Bioét. [Internet]. 2026 Jul. 15 [cited 2026 Jul. 17];34. Available from: https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/3980