Ethical dilemmas of expert evaluations in the workplace

Authors

Abstract

Decisions on issues concerning the health of public servants, such as leaves for treatment, are based on the results of medical examinations conducted by a medical professional. These workers are examined by the so-called Integrated Subsystem for Civil Servant Health Care. However, the experts who work in it and the patients work in the same governmental bodies, which can create conflicting situations and ethical dilemmas. This article addresses the issue from the perspective of an expert of the Federal Public Administration, seeking to emphasize ethics, respect for ethical principles, technical excellence, and common sense as guidelines for the balance between the role of expert
and personal closeness to co-workers.

Keywords:

Expert testimony. Ethics, medical. Public sector.

Author Biography

Camilo Ferreira Ramos, Doutorando em Bioética pela Universidade do Porto

Médico, Residência Médica em Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem, Mestre em Doenças Tropicais, Doutorando em Bioética pela Universidade do Porto. Médico-Perito do Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Pará.

How to Cite

1.
Ramos CF. Ethical dilemmas of expert evaluations in the workplace. Rev. bioét.(Impr.). [Internet]. 2022 Oct. 18 [cited 2024 May 13];30(3). Available from: https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/2631