Spirituality and religiosity in patients with systemic arterial hypertension

Authors

  • Cristiane de Fátima Silva Universidade Federal de Alfenas-MG
  • Fernanda Ribeiro Borges Universidade Federal de Alfenas-MG
  • Carolina Costa Valcanti Avelino Universidade Federal de Alfenas-MG
  • Amanda Vaz Tostes Campos Miarelli Universidade Federal de Alfenas-MG
  • Gabriela Itagiba Aguiar Vieira Universidade Federal de Alfenas-MG
  • Sueli Leiko Takamatsu Goyatá Universidade Federal de Alfenas-MG

Abstract

Systemic arterial hypertension is a major risk factor for complications such as acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and chronic kidney disease, which results in an important public health problem in Brazil, generating high medical and socioeconomic costs due to such complications. Systemic arterial hypertension associated with aspects such as spirituality and religiosity has been the subject of several studies. Thus, a descriptive, exploratory, cross-sectional study was conducted in order to assess the spirituality and religiosity of 65 hypertensive patients of a Service Center for Chronic Diseases. The domains “forgiveness” and “self-assessment” received better scores, with an average of 1.42 and 1.46, respectively. Whereas the “organizational religiosity” domain resulted in a higher average among respondents (3.00). Spirituality and religiosity of hypertensive patients are important dimensions that must be considered in developing a holistic treatment plan.

Keywords:

Spirituality. Religion. Hypertension.

Author Biography

Cristiane de Fátima Silva, Universidade Federal de Alfenas-MG

Enfermeira. Residente Multiprofissional em Saúde da Família. Escola de Enfermagem. Universidade Federal de Alfenas-MG.

How to Cite

1.
Silva C de F, Borges FR, Avelino CCV, Miarelli AVTC, Vieira GIA, Goyatá SLT. Spirituality and religiosity in patients with systemic arterial hypertension. Rev. bioét.(Impr.). [Internet]. 2016 Jul. 20 [cited 2024 May 18];24(2). Available from: https://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/revista_bioetica/article/view/1170